Peer-Reviewed PapersPosted by Søren R. Frimodt-Møller Aug 26, 2014 21:56:00
Aaron Ridley posed the question of whether results in the ontology of musical works would have implications for judgements about the interpretation, meaning or aesthetic value of musical works and performances. His arguments for the conclusion that the ontology of musical works have no aesthetic consequences are unsuccessful, but he is right in thinking (in opposition to Andrew Kania and others) that ontological judgements have no aesthetic consequences. The key to demonstrating this conclusion is the recognition that ontological judgments are a priori and aesthetic judgments are empirical. A priori judgements have no empirical consequences. Neither fundamental ontology of music nor higher- order ontological reflections have any aesthetic consequences.
The author, James O. Young is professor of Philosophy at the University of Victoria. He is the author of Global-anti-realism (1995), Art and Knowledge (2001), Cultural Appropriation and the Arts (2008) and more than 50 articles in refereed journals. His latest book, Critique of Pure Music, is forthcoming from Oxford University Press.
Read James O. Young's article here.
|Choose site to share content on|